Acoustic Equipment Research Utilizing a Vacuum Chamber

A hearing aid company designs, manufactures, and assembles sophisticated acoustic parts such as special microphones and speakers. In order to test the microphone and speakers which go into hearing aids, as well as fully assembled hearing aids, it is imperative to know at which point the failure happens. Does the failure happen due to elevation or due to improperly designed and built hardware or software?

To eliminate any acoustic sound entering the microphone or emitting from the speaker, a vacuum chamber is utilized. Sound does not travel in vacuum since sound is simply vibration of air molecules. By pulling the chamber down to a vacuum of less than 100 millitorr, any exposure to background sound sources is eliminated. The only thing that is left is sound generated from electrical sources such as improper circuit design or background radiation. This also helps to determine how sophisticated audio equipment interacts with wireless internet signals or cellphone signals. There are countless sources of noise or electrical feedback which can cause the hearing aid device to fail.

Fortunately Acrylic Vacuum Chambers that are clear and transparent will enable to acoustic development engineer to perform high integrity testing on hearing aid circuits and assemblies.

You are looking our custom made vacuum chamber, 12 inch cube, top load model with a spring supported lid. There is also a small through hole which was drilled to enable to experimenter to run wires from the outside to the inside. We were not able to use a vacuum feedthrough as the requirement was that we could not cut the testing wires because cutting the testing wires would create electrical noise and interference. At this point, the experimenter will plate a Buna-N film, over the hole, then she will run the electrical wire through the Buna-N hole and through the hole drilled into the side wall of chamber.

Did it work? Yes, we were able to get a good seal and pull the vacuum down to less than 0.1 Torr. Sometimes additional Vacuum Grease was used to seal some leakers. The experimenter was able to go down to specified 0.075 Torr and stay at that level for some time in order to complete their analysis.

Are you conducting tests on high performance acoustic and electrical circuits. Contact Us to see how we can make your experiments better.

WAIT! Take a look at similar Items you may like…

We treat our customers well by Over-Delivering on our Promises (reason why we are Highly Rated on Google My Business). There is a tremendous amount of valuable resources and information regarding vacuum systems and vacuum technology; check them out by clicking on the links below.

Vacuum Decay Leak Testing Systems
Vacuum Decay Leak Testing Systems are Instruments that detect and quantify a leak by measuring the drop in vacuum (pressure) inside the specimen. During a vacuum decay leak test, the specimen is placed into a vacuum chamber, the vacuum is pulled to a specified setpoint, and the drop in vacuum is monitored and recorded over time. If a leak in the specimen exists, the air will travel from a higher pressure (inside the specimen) to a lower pressure (vacuum chamber). As a results of the additional air, the vacuum levels will drop whereas a leak can be detected and quantified.
Rotary Vacuum Feedthroughs
Rotary Vacuum Feedthroughs are devices that will enable you to physically rotate a specimen inside the vacuum chamber while vacuum present without decreasing the vacuum.
Our Work: Altitude Testing in a Vacuum Chamber
It is not a secret that you can simulate a certain altitude in a vacuum chamber. The good thing about Acrylic Vacuum Chambers is not only that you can simulate an altitude of up to 250,000 feet, you can also fully view your test specimen during your testing operation.
Related Articles: Visual Inspection Quality Testing of Heat Sealed Packages
Visual inspection is an attractive option because it does not require the purchase of any additional equipment. There are several arguments against Visual Inspection of heat seals; the argument against visual inspection is that visual inspection is subjective, unreliable, operator dependent, or not a valid method of inspection. However, if you have the correct training, procedures, and documentation in place, visual inspection can become a powerful tool in your quest for better packaging.