ASTM F2391 Protocol Explained, Helium Tracer Gas Leak Testing for Packages

ASTM F2391 is the recognized standard test method for measuring the integrity of packages and seals by using helium as a tracer gas. Rather than watching for a visual indication like a bubble stream, this method relies on a mass spectrometer leak detector that counts the actual tracer gas molecules crossing a leak path, which makes it dramatically more sensitive than visual or pressure-change techniques. The method as written calls for three ingredients: helium serving as the tracer gas, a helium-capable mass spectrometer leak detector, and a test fixture built for the specific package or product being evaluated. Because helium must usually be introduced into a sealed package by puncturing the wall and then patching the injection site, most applications of this technique are destructive, and the patched unit often can no longer be sold. When helium is instead introduced into the headspace before the package is sealed, the finished unit can be tested without damaging it, and the technician simply checks whether helium is escaping from the finished pack.

The standard defines two ways of running the test. In Procedure A, commonly called sniffer or probe mode, the package is charged with helium and the operator sweeps a probe wand over the outside of the package, with the instrument sampling any tracer gas venting from a leak. In Procedure B, the vacuum mode, the package sits inside a sealed fixture that is evacuated; every helium atom that escapes through a leak is swept into the detector, and the instrument reports a calibrated, quantitative total leak rate. The supporting precision data published with the standard reflects Procedure B, and the standard itself points out that sniffer results can drift from operator to operator, since squeezing the pack, scan speed, the number and size of leak paths, background helium levels, and material permeability all influence the reading. Sensitivity is extraordinary by packaging standards: the method can pin down leak rates in the range of roughly 10^-2 down to 10^-5 Pa·m³/s (about 10^-1 down to 10^-4 cc/sec/atm), with finer resolution in vacuum mode than is realistically achievable with a hand probe.

Elevate your package integrity program with ASTM F2391, the reference standard for quantitative tracer gas leak testing of packages and seals. Understanding this protocol in detail is the difference between an arbitrary pass/fail screen and a calibrated, repeatable measurement you can defend in an audit. Don't leave compliance to chance. Secure the official documentation today to safeguard the integrity of your testing procedures with complete confidence.

Purchase your copy now!

Although the two procedures share the same core philosophy, they play very different roles on the production floor. Sniffer mode is a locating tool: because the operator scans a probe across the surface, it tells you where the leak is, which is invaluable during root-cause investigations on a suspect seal line. Its accuracy depends heavily on technique, so it is best treated as semi-quantitative, and its practical floor sits far above the instrument's theoretical sensitivity because a probe cannot gather every escaping atom. Vacuum mode is the counting method for finished packages. Because the test cell is evacuated, ambient air stops blanketing the package and even tiny flows of tracer gas are captured and measured directly. The standard's sensitivity figures reflect this: it can catch defects orders of magnitude beyond the reach of dye penetration or bubble-emission methods. Below is a step-by-step breakdown of a typical ASTM F2391 test:

Preparation:
Select a representative specimen. For the non-destructive route, helium is introduced into the package headspace at a defined partial pressure before the final seal is made. For the destructive route, the technician charges the sealed package through a small puncture and seals the puncture site with a compatible patch or plug; the patch must itself be verified as tight, because a leaky patch will mimic a defective seal. Helium's low atmospheric concentration and its inert, non-reactive nature mean background levels are low and stable, so any tracer gas later detected is a true signal.

Calibration:
Before testing, the mass spectrometer leak detector is calibrated against a calibrated leak standard of known leak rate. This step is the core difference between this method and the visual methods: the operator is not guessing at bubble counts. The instrument output is traceable, so a reading of, say, 5 x 10^-5 Pa·m³/s means exactly what it says, and sensitivity claims in the 10^-5 to 10^-6 range can be demonstrated rather than assumed.

Vacuum Mode Execution (Procedure B):
The charged package is loaded into a fixture whose cavity matches the specimen geometry, so the free volume around the pack is minimized. The fixture is then sealed and pulled down to vacuum. As the pressure differential develops, helium escapes through any defect along the seal or wall and is drawn by the detector's sampling line. The leak rate is recorded directly from the calibrated instrument, giving a quantitative, unit-of-leak measurement rather than a simple pass/fail observation.

Sniffer Mode Execution (Procedure A):
The helium-filled package is exposed to ambient air, and the operator moves the probe nozzle over the surfaces of interest, holding the correct standoff distance and scan speed. Where a leak exists, escaping helium is aspirated into the probe and the detector indicates or logs a signal. Because a sniffer reading depends on operator handling, fixture design, and how many leak paths are active, results should be treated as location-first, measurement-second.

Interpretation:
A helium signal above the calibrated background baseline confirms a leak path, and the reported leak rate can be compared against the acceptance criterion set for the product. This is where F2391 earns its reputation: it exposes micro-channels that would never produce a visible bubble, and it measures them precisely enough to trend a sealing process over time rather than merely grade it.

Shortcomings of this Testing Method

The most practical limitation of ASTM F2391 is cost and complexity. Helium is a consumable gas, mass spectrometer leak detectors are among the most expensive instruments in the leak testing world, and both the equipment and the calibrated leak standards require regular maintenance and verification. Compared to a simple bubble-emission bath or an electronic decay tester, the barrier to entry is significantly higher.

In its most common form, the method is destructive: helium must be injected through the package wall and the site patched. Every step of that repair introduces its own potential leak path, and the patched specimen is typically no longer saleable. Sniffer mode adds a second weakness: because readings vary with the operator's scan speed, probe standoff distance, background helium, and even gas permeation through the packaging material, it is better suited to finding a leak than to measuring it, a fact the standard itself acknowledges by limiting its supporting precision data to vacuum mode. For packages made of plastics that admit gases, permeating gases can also confound sniffer readings. Vacuum mode avoids much of this, but it depends on close-fitting custom fixtures for each package style, so the fixturing cost scales with the product line.

Conclusion

ASTM F2391 occupies the top of the leak-testing sensitivity ladder for packaging. Where bubble-emission and decay-based methods stop at millibar-liter-scale flaws, this method reliably verifies seal integrity against fine leaks on the order of 10^-5 Pa·m³/s and beyond. It is the method of choice when a product genuinely cannot fail: modified-atmosphere food pouches, medical devices, barrier packaging for sensitive electronics, and specialty containers whose contents must not interact with the environment.

Like every tool in this library, the protocol rewards understanding. Knowing that most F2391 applications are destructive and therefore sample-destroying, knowing that sniffer mode is a locating tool rather than a measuring one, and knowing that quantitative results come from vacuum mode with properly calibrated instrumentation are the key ideas to carry out of the standard. With that knowledge, a team can reserve this method for the work it does best: precise, quantitative verification and failure investigation, with faster and cheaper screening methods handling routine inspection.

Strengthen your package integrity program and protect your products with ASTM F2391 capable helium leak testing solutions. CONTACT US today to learn how we can help you ensure the highest standards of safety and quality!

Similar Items

We are an Engineering Excellence Company. What are you building? Take a look at the links below and discover some of the cool things we make.

Force Decay Leak Testing Systems
Force Decay Leak Testing Systems are instruments that detect and quantify leaks in a test specimen through measuring the drop in force an inflated specimen applied onto a pressure transducer. The specimen is placed into a vacuum chamber, a vacuum is pulled, and the test sample inflates. As the test sample inflates, it applied a specific force onto the force transducer. This force is measured and recorded over time. If a leak exists, the specimen will deflate and lose pressure, as a result, the force it applies onto the force transducer will decrease. This in turn will enable for detection and quantification of a leak in the specimen.
Liquid and Gas Vacuum Feedthroughs
A Liquid and Gas Vacuum Feedthroughs are tubes that will allow you to run liquid or gas into your vacuum chamber without contaminating the vacuum levels or vacuum chamber in general. Say you are looking to run a coolant into the vacuum chamber and cool a component you are testing. You can simply install a liquid and gas vacuum feedthrough are run your coolant towards your test specimen.
Our Work: Altitude Testing in a Vacuum Chamber
It is not a secret that you can simulate a certain altitude in a vacuum chamber. The good thing about Acrylic Vacuum Chambers is not only that you can simulate an altitude of up to 250,000 feet, you can also fully view your test specimen during your testing operation.
Related Articles: Anatomy of the Pressure Decay, Vacuum Decay, and Force Decay Curve
How do you know that you have a good part during your leak test? In order to understand your leak test, you must first understand the Test Decay Curve and what it tells you about your test specimen. There is a certain way that a test specimen behaves during the leak test.